Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Dear Bruce, > > > > So maybe the following TODO could be kept: > > > - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard > > > > > > I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be > > > welcome just to check that nothing is broken. > > > > Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item > > that is only possible. > > Sorry, I do not understand your argument, what you mean by "only > possible". Or are you talking about roles?? > > I see TODO items as wishes, and I'm not sure I can see what is wrong with > wishing better/full testing of postgresql data access controls and compare > the results with what is defined by the norm?
I guess I am looking for a more detailed analysis that there is a problem to be fixed. Yes, I would like more testing too, but we need more testing in lots of areas, but it doesn't make it a TODO item. I guess I am asking why this area needs more testing for spec compliance. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
