Your name : Jérôme Bouat
Your email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Configuration
---------------------
Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : AMD Duron Mobile
Operating System (example: Linux 2.4.18) : Linux 2.6.3
PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.4.1): PostgreSQL-7.4.1
Compiler used (example: gcc 2.95.2) : 3.3.2
Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
------------------------------------------------
I know some database design methods (Merise, ...) but I'm a newbie with
using database (I already used Microsoft Access and MySQL). I read some
comparaison between MySQL and PostgreSQL. Although PostgreSQL seems to
be more powerfull than MySQL, it is a little more complicated to use.
When I want to create a database, I have to browse all the
documentation. I think it is not intuitive enough.
Programs which interact with the database server have very different
names.
For example :
- "initdb" creates a new cluster
- "createdb" creates a database
- "pg_ctl" controls a database
Why "initdb" and "createdb" should be related with PostgreSQL ?
Don't you think other database managers could share the host on which
PostgreSQL is installed ?
If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Could you not use an homogeneous names pattern ?
All those programs names:
- initdb
- initlocation
- ipcclean
- clusterdb
- createdb
- createlang
- createuser
- dropdb
- droplang
- dropuser
- vacuumdb
- psql
could follow a pattern you already choosed:
pg_*
Then, the user could choose the actions he wants by autocompleting the
'pg_' begin in a shell.
More generally, could you not provide an unique tool from which you
could be guided in order to perform the action you want ?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
