Tom Lane wrote:
> Looking at the code, this seems to be intentional, because the
> privilege check is not made for revokes only for grants:
> Peter, do you remember why you did it that way?
I'm not really sure right now. It doesn't really make sense, does it?
Certainly, the SQL standard requires a privilege check on revoke.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
