On Thursday 15 January 2004 15:25, you wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > I'm not sure what state of play is here? > > Are you saying this is intended behavour and therefore not a bug, in > which case I'll implement one of the work around solutions rather than > wait for a patch that prevents invalid SQL from executing valid sub > transactions.
I'm saying it _could_ be considered a feature rather than a bug, but the people who will know more than me will be hanging out on the jdbc list. It's entirely possible that someone there will go "oh, that - you just need to ...." -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
