Troels Arvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In Jim Melton and Alan Simon's "SQL:1999 - Understanding Relational
> Language Components" (ISBN 1-55860-456-1), they write that the following
> is to be interpreted as a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE value:

> TIMESTAMP '2003-07-29 13:19:30.5+02:00'

> PostgreSQL interprets the above as a TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE value of
> '2003-07-29 13:19:30.5', i.e. it simply discards the '+02:00' part and
> fails to interpret it as being of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE type.

That's true, and I think we are unlikely to change it.  Postgres
interprets this construct as a special case of a general
        datatype_name 'literal string'
construction.  To allow the contents of the literal to determine the
datatype specification would break the general construct completely.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to