Troels Arvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In Jim Melton and Alan Simon's "SQL:1999 - Understanding Relational > Language Components" (ISBN 1-55860-456-1), they write that the following > is to be interpreted as a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE value:
> TIMESTAMP '2003-07-29 13:19:30.5+02:00' > PostgreSQL interprets the above as a TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE value of > '2003-07-29 13:19:30.5', i.e. it simply discards the '+02:00' part and > fails to interpret it as being of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE type. That's true, and I think we are unlikely to change it. Postgres interprets this construct as a special case of a general datatype_name 'literal string' construction. To allow the contents of the literal to determine the datatype specification would break the general construct completely. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly