Does it have to do with NEW and OLD with UNIONS?
Or is it simply any conditional rule using UNION/EXCEPT/INTERSECT/...?
I ask because I'm confused by Tom's examples of failures.
Tom Lane wrote:
Dmitry Tkach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Tom Lane wrote:Dmitry Tkach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:It would have saved a lot of trouble if it just complained about that union thing right away and refuse to create the rule...That's what happens in CVS tip.I thought you said it was only complaining about references to new and old, not about *any* union clause...I don't see a need to reject "any" union clause. AFAIK the cases that don't work are just the ones where NEW or OLD are referenced. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
