Ok, I found what's append :

1/ current value of the sequence data are following :

scheduling=# select * from seq_id_fch;
 sequence_name | last_value | increment_by | max_value
 | min_value | cache_value | log_cnt | is_cycled |
is_called
---------------+------------+--------------+------------+-----------+-------------+---------+-----------+-----------
 seq_id_fch    |          1 |            1 |
2147483647 |         1 |           1 |       0 | f    
    | t
(1 row)


2/ Line 6083, we have a request to get these
informations :

SELECT sequence_name, last_value, increment_by,
CASE WHEN increment_by > 0 AND max_value =
9223372036854775807 THEN NULL
     WHEN increment_by < 0 AND max_value = -1 THEN
NULL
     ELSE max_value
END AS max_value,
CASE WHEN increment_by > 0 AND min_value = 1 THEN NULL
     WHEN increment_by < 0 AND min_value =
-9223372036854775807 THEN NULL
         ELSE min_value
END AS min_value,
cache_value, is_cycled, is_called from seq_id_fch;
 sequence_name | last_value | increment_by | max_value
 | min_value | cache_value | is_cycled | is_called
---------------+------------+--------------+------------+-----------+-------------+-----------+-----------
 seq_id_fch    |          1 |            1 |
2147483647 |           |           1 | f         | t
 
As you can see, "min_value" is NULL because 
CASE WHEN increment_by (=1) > 0 AND min_value (=1) = 1
THEN NULL


3/ Line 6156, we're creating the request
                appendPQExpBuffer(query,
                                   "CREATE SEQUENCE %s\n    START WITH %s\n   
INCREMENT BY %s\n",
                                                  fmtId(tbinfo->relname),
                                                  (called ? minv : last), incby);
so, with values, it's
seq:'seq_id_fch', [called : 1] ? [minv : ''
(00000000)], [last : '1' (400303eb)]
seq:'x', [called : 0] ? [minv : '' (00000000)], [last
: '1' (400303e2)]

and we create a request w/ a NULL pointer w/
"seq_id_fch" whereas it's ok for "x".

I duno what is the goal of "is_called" field, it's the
only difference b/w "x" and "seq_id_fch", and the only
thing touching "seq_id_fch" is some granting.
Anyway, I think the fault is on request line 6083
because we may create erroneous lines for nothing. Why
can't we take directly informations from sequence data
?

Bye

Laurent


=====
The misspelling master is on the Web.
   _________    100 % Dictionnary Free !
  /        /(
 /  Dico  / /   Pleins d'autres fautes sur
/________/ /    http://go.to/destroyedlolo
(#######( /     http://destroyedlolo.homeunix.org:8080
Quoi, des fautes d'orthographe! Pas possible ;-D.

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to