Both are flagged though--the other one's 85 lines down in the bug report.. ;) I probably should've sorted the list by location to minimize confusion. Thanks for the feedback!
-Yichen On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > This looks like great stuff --- I haven't read through all of them, but > at least the first couple look like genuine bugs. I'm a little > suspicious of the tool's coverage though. For example, in > src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_tw_and_big5/big5.c, > why'd it flag only one of the two loops that use the same incorrect > limit for scanning b1c4[][] ? > > regards, tom lane > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
