[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If a whole filesystem (eg a whole disk in one filesystem that is
> dedicated to postgres data) is mounted on data location (typically
> /var/lib/pgsql/data), initdb files besause of the existence of the
> lost+found directory in the filesystem root.
> There is an easy by pass by moving lost+found elsewhere, run initdb
> and re move lost+found to its original location. Nevertheless, having
> initdb tolerate lost+found (or equivalents for other fs types) would
> be an improvement.
Hmm. Plan B would be to create a data directory just under the mount
point and let PGDATA point there, rather than at the actual filesystem
root directory. I am inclined to think that Plan B is considerably
safer than what you propose, because what you propose requires that the
unprivileged postgres user own the filesystem root directory. That
seems like a bad idea (should postgres be able to remove/rename
lost+found? No sir.)
Certainly it would be easy to make initdb ignore "lost+found" appearing
in the target directory ... I'm just not seeing the argument why this
setup is really a good idea.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
