Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sean Chittenden wrote: > >> Was there any resolution to this or are SET's still starting a new > >> transaction? I haven't seen any commits re: this, iirc. -sc > > > It is still an open item, but I think there was agreement that SET will > > not start a transaction, and we will document that. > > There was? I thought you were resisting it tooth and nail ;-) > > If you're willing to accept this behavior, I shall make it happen.
Sure. I posted this on September 18: > OK, I am ready to say I was wrong. Most people like that behavior so > let's do it. Thanks for listening to me. I took my best shot but most people disagreed, so I am ready to move forward. I only ask that the behavior of SET be documented where we document autocommit so it doesn't trip anyone up. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
