Is this a TODO item or something for beta2?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rod Taylor wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 19:30, Tom Lane wrote: > > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The big difference is that the INNER JOIN code needs to drop one of the > > > colb's coming up with a virtual relation cola, colb, colc; where the > > > other doesn't have such a renaming scheme. > > > > On reflection I think it might be possible to make this work the way > > Tim wants: I think it would be okay for the dependency-extracter code > > to ignore the Var lists that are attached to join RTEs. Needs more > > thought though, and I don't plan to think about it before Monday; > > I'm taking the weekend off ... > > Your right. The view continues to function perfectly fine with the > column dropped (did a delete from pg_depend to allow it). > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
