Scott writes: > Yep I thought so - that's why I didn't think it's really a bug - but the > include really ought to be after the define, and if it was I would be able > to use the same headers for both cygwin and non-cygwin builds...would just > be 'nice to have'.
Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to discuss your proposal. Maybe it's possible, but someone knowledgeable needs to check that it doesn't break anything else. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
