Did you vacuum it? I hope, it helps...
Dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Markus Grill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >creating indices after data insertion > >Long Description >Hello, > >in my opinion there is a big bug with indexes. >I used Postgresql 7.1.3 and 7.2.1 > >First I create two tables t_a and t_b with the fields t_a.id, t_a.bid and t_b.id >where t_a.bid is a foreign key for t_b.id. >Then I insert many data records in the two tables. >After that I create one index i1 on t_a.id, one index i2 on t_a.bid and one index i3 >on t_b.id. > >When I select over just one of the two tables (EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t_a WHERE t_a.id >= 'XXX';) then the query plan (and the query) uses index scans. > >But when I select over the two tables with a join (EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t_a, t_b >WHERE t_aid = 'XXX' AND t_a_bid = t_b_id;) then the query plan uses slow seq scans >(That's not OK)! > >We tried another thing: >First creating the tables, >then creating the indexes >and then inserting the data records: >In this case the query uses index scans (that's OK)! > >We tried a third thing: >Creating the tables, creating the indexes, inserting the data records: >---> index scans (OK). >Then dropping the indexes and creating three new indexes: >---> seq scans (not OK). > >Please do not say, I should create my indexes first, because this IS a bug. >That's a big problem when inserting many data records, because it's much faster to >drop the index first, then inserting the data and then creating new indexes. > >Please help! :-) > >Sample Code >My real life examle: >The first example is the bug the second is the running one: > >testrpr=# EXPLAIN SELECT * from inf_information, auct_sys_infogruppe where inf_alias >= 'asdfasdf' and infgrp_id = auct_sys_infogruppe.inf_id; >NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > >Hash Join (cost=5.95..8.86 rows=1 width=1070) > -> Seq Scan on auct_sys_infogruppe (cost=0.00..2.61 rows=61 width=555) > -> Hash (cost=5.94..5.94 rows=1 width=515) > -> Index Scan using xak1inf_information on inf_information (cost=0.00..5.94 >rows=1 width=515) > >NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > >Hash Join (cost=5.95..8.86 rows=1 width=1070) > -> Seq Scan on auct_sys_infogruppe (cost=0.00..2.61 rows=61 width=555) > -> Hash (cost=5.94..5.94 rows=1 width=515) > -> Index Scan using xak1inf_information on inf_information (cost=0.00..5.94 >rows=1 width=515) > >EXPLAIN > >------------------------------------------ > >testrpr=# EXPLAIN SELECT * from inf_information, auct_sys_infogruppe where inf_alias >= 'asdfasdf' and infgrp_id = auct_sys_infogruppe.inf_id; >NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > >Nested Loop (cost=0.00..9.66 rows=1 width=1070) > -> Index Scan using xak1inf_information on inf_information (cost=0.00..4.82 >rows=1 width=515) > -> Index Scan using xpkauct_sys_infogruppe on auct_sys_infogruppe >(cost=0.00..4.82 rows=1 width=555) > >NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > >Nested Loop (cost=0.00..9.66 rows=1 width=1070) > -> Index Scan using xak1inf_information on inf_information (cost=0.00..4.82 >rows=1 width=515) > -> Index Scan using xpkauct_sys_infogruppe on auct_sys_infogruppe >(cost=0.00..4.82 rows=1 width=555) > >EXPLAIN > >No file was uploaded with this report > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
