"Jonathan C. Patschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's one warning that really bothered me, though. I don't know the
> code well-enough to make this call, but I almost have to agree with the
> compiler:
Hmm ... it's correct, but my is it ugly. Someone trying to be too cute.
Will change it to be more intelligible.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
