Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> That is entirely the wrong place to put it. There is a section > >> specifically about libpq's reentrancy or lack of it; mention the > >> issue there. > > > Uh, I put it in this section: > > Um ... duh ... I can only plead momentary brain fade. Yes, that > is the right section. > > But I'd suggest moving it down a para or two, to put it next to the > para pointing out that PQoidStatus etc are not thread-safe. That > was the context I was expecting to see. > > Also, the "however" can be left out, and ditto "guarantted to be" > (which is mispelled anyway...)
Done. Moved to bottom of section; words removed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
