Tom Lane writes:
> Timezone handling in PG is dependent on the underlying OS' timezone
> database, which doesn't go back further than 1901 in any Unix that
> I've heard of. You should realize of course that the very notion of
> timezone was only standardized in the 1800s, so attaching a timezone
> to dates much older than that would be a dubious practice anyway...
Thus Rainer's point is that when having times both before and after 1901
in the same data set you get inconsistencies. This seems like a good
reason to introduce a true 'timestamp without time zone' type.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
