Here is a bit more information on this date type problem.
Welcome to the POSTGRESQL interactive sql monitor:
Please read the file COPYRIGHT for copyright terms of POSTGRESQL
[PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf3.4, compiled by gcc 2.7.2.3]
type \? for help on slash commands
type \q to quit
type \g or terminate with semicolon to execute query
You are currently connected to the database: darcy
darcy=> select date_part('dow','april 1, 2001'::date);
date_part
---------
6
(1 row)
darcy=> select date_part('dow','april 2, 2001'::date);
date_part
---------
1
(1 row)
darcy=>\q
At 10:17 AM 4/3/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> At 00:59 3/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> However, the horology diffs are not, and I can't reproduce them here.
>>> Did anyone else see that?
>
>> I've just started seeing both...
>
>What is the date of the nearest daylight-savings transition in your
>timezone?
>
>Wait a minute ... considering that the regress tests run in PST8PDT,
>your local timezone shouldn't make a difference. Maybe a platform-
>specific issue? What platform (esp. which C library) do you use?
>
>FWIW, as of this morning I'm back to no failure on timestamp test
>(as expected), and still no horology failure either.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
