Hi all, I already reported this directly to Peter Mount but since I have since joined this list I thought I should make it a more wide-spread report. The issue is that if you use getDate() on a field that is a timestamp type then you will get an SQLException that wraps a NumberFormatException. While this behavior is arguably correct, our main problem is that PG 7.0 did not have this problem and I think it would be nice if 7.1 didn't break our old code. To that end, the following is as replacement to the getDate() method it ResultSet and fixes the problem, at least for me. I think it is harmless to provide the ability to get a date from a timestamp. If you do not agree to add this to the JDBC driver please let me know ASAP so that I can begin fixing our code in preparation for 7.1. /** * Get the value of a column in the given row as a java.sql.Date * object. This handles both <code>Timestamp</code> and <code> * Date</code> fields, truncating the time portion in the case of a * Timestamp. * * @param columnIndex the first column is 1, the second is 2... * @return the column value; null if SQL NULL * @exception SQLException if a database access error occurs */ public java.sql.Date getDate( int columnIndex ) throws SQLException { String s = getString( columnIndex ); if( s == null ) return null; java.sql.Date date = null; try { date = java.sql.Date.valueOf( s ); } catch( NumberFormatException e ) { date = new java.sql.Date( getTimestamp( columnIndex ).getTime() ); } return date; } Best regards, --Rainer

Reply via email to