Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>But since the problematic word in your case is not CALL but SELECT, I can
>tell you right away with relative certainty that it will not be possible
>to change the parser to accept SELECT as an identifier in all contexts
>without butchering the grammar beyond reason.
Just found out how MSSQL does it...it cheats!
The parser takes 'create table test (select int)' and converts it into
'create table test ([select] int)'.
I guess that this isn't an SQL92/99 compliant method :)
Thanks for the help,
Chris
