[BUGS] Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

[Tom Lane]

"Thomas T. Thai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Uh, why are you altering NS32K code in an Alpha patch?  I did not apply
>> this.

> cause egcs on NetBSD/Alpha will give lots of error during compile. we
> don't have gcc 2.95.2 on the alpha working yet.

But the proposed diff is inside #if defined(NEED_NS32K_TAS_ASM).
How can that affect an Alpha compilation at all?

                        regards, tom lane