[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Elian Carsenat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity
>of 2
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails start cause PG_VERSION
>
> Long Description
> NT Binary V7.0 - postgres fails to start because PG_VERSION not recognized properly
>(windows char encoding ?)
>
> See example code.
>
> Thanks guys for your great database!
>
> Sample Code
> C:\pgsql\bin>postgres.exe 1>postgres.log
> DEBUG: Data Base System is starting up at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
> DEBUG: Data Base System was interrupted being in production at Tue Nov 14 09:34
> :14 2000
> DEBUG: Data Base System is in production state at Tue Nov 14 09:34:39 2000
> FATAL 1: Version number in file 'C:\pgsql\data/PG_VERSION' should be 7.0
> , not 7.0
>
> No file was uploaded with this report
>From the line break in the "should be 7.0
, not 7.0" I wonder if it isn't a CRLF vs LF problem?
Regards,
Andrew.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Andrew McMillan, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst IT Ltd, PO Box 10-225, Level 22, 105 The Terrace, Wellington
Me: +64 (21) 635 694, Fax: +64 (4) 499 5596, Office: +64 (4) 499 2267
