Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ulsec=# truncate job;
> NOTICE: Buffer Leak: [002] (freeNext=-3, freePrev=-3, relname=job, blockNum=0,
> flags=0xc, refcount=1 -1)
> TRUNCATE
Hmm, that's interesting. It shouldn't be possible for PrivateRefCount
(the last value printed) to become negative. Can you give a sequence
for reproducing this notice from a standing start?
The notice isn't especially worrisome in itself, but to the extent that
it implies some incorrect bookkeeping of buffer refcounts, there could
be a problem lurking somewhere.
regards, tom lane
