Re: [BUGS] Bug in move 0

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We may have documented the behavior, but that doesn't make it right ;-)
>> If someone were to submit a patch to change MOVE 0 into a no-op
>> (without breaking MOVE ALL of course), I'd vote to apply it.

> If we do that, how does one move to the end of a cursor?

MOVE ALL.

The problem right now is just that MOVE ALL is internally represented
as MOVE 0 ... there needs to be a different representation for it.

                        regards, tom lane