Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I know I might have had a different opinion on this before but I'm
>> beginning to think that the path to any auxiliary programs needs to be
> I understand your concern. My question is how does someone access
> initdb without getting binaries of the same version?
> Seems it may be happening, but how?
One easy way would be to type an explicit path to an initdb that's
not in your PATH (and, therefore, its associated postgres binary
isn't either). For instance, "./initdb" would fail if . is either
not in your PATH or placed later than a directory containing another
version of postgres...
regards, tom lane
