Hi Guillaume On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit : >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> We had 1.2 support. To have 2.0, we would have to get rid of the >>> sl_trigger checks. Or was it dropped along the way of 2.0? >> >> No idea - I just recall Sachin working on compatibility, and that was >> one of/the patch he came of with. >> > > Yeah, you're right. I now see the commit. Which means we have two bugs > on 2.0 support.
What happened with this in the end? I've just run into the pg_listener bug again. I see from the thread you said you were going to work on it, but then we got side-tracked into a discussion on whether we should have slony support at all. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
