Alexander Kirpa wrote: >> I don't understand the problem. 12345678901234567890 is out of range >> for a bigint so should never be returned as one. Please provide a self >> contained test case to illustrate the problem. > Sorry. '12345678901234567890' should by '1234567890123456789' for sample > only. > I speak about partially visible (or not) field value.
Oh, you mean the column width? We don't attempt to auto-size the columns at all, though you can double click a header to make that happen. Any changes to that code will have to wait until the next development cycle. > -------------------- > Crash again. > > Version 1.8.0 RC1 (Oct 9 2007, rev: 6725) > The instruction at "0x0058b778" referenced memory at "0x031cc018". The > memory could not be "read". > > During expanding DB tree in multi DB servers environment. I can't reproduce this here in SVN trunk, though I did fix a bug that could easily have caused that a couple of days back. Do you have the 'View System Objects' option turned on so that template0 is visible? Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
