[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
I've implemented that change as suggested. The existing code went out of
it's way to behave as it did (using setval|('my_seq', 111, FALSE); on <
7.4 in fact!) so it was obviously a conscious design choice, but it's
not one I can see any justification for!
Cheers, Dave.
Nice!
Additionally displaying the sequence's is_called flag in the properties
is not an easy option, I assume?
Congratulations on the newly released v 1.6.3, btw! Seems to be the best
pgAdmin I have seen so far. :)
Regards
Erwin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
