> -----Original Message----- > From: Roman Fail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 March 2003 16:01 > To: Fabiano; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] No entry to pg_hba.conf 10.17.11.16 > > > I'm not a TCP/IP networking expert, but I'm pretty certain > that 10.x.x.x addresses are the very definition of a private > non-routable Class A network. Which means the subnet mask > should be 255.0.0.0. >
Yes and no. In this case, the mask is used to determine the number of bits in the address that are relevant to the rule, so: 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 - All bits are relevant, so the entry applies only to that exact address. 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 - The first 24 bits are relevant, so the entry applies to 192.168.1.x 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 - The first 16 bits are relevant, so the entry applies to 192.168.x.x I think in this case, the problem is that 'local' is specified, which generally applies to Unix domain sockets, and that one column is missing as Keith suggested: > local all 10.17.11.0 255.255.255.0 trust To let hosts with an address of 10.17.11.x in, the entry should probably be: host all all 10.17.11.0 255.255.255.0 trust Regards, Dave.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
