> -----Original Message-----
> From: the kay (efesar) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 01 December 2002 05:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] 32 Character Constraint Name Bug?
> 
> 
> 
> First of all, sorry for the long post. I think I found a bug.
> 
> I get this error when I click on my table "fearuser" in the tree
> schemas->public->tables (table definition to follow).
> 
> ==========
> 
> pgAdmin  II Error
> 
> An error has occurred in pgAdmin II:frmMain.tvTable:
> 
> Number: 457
> Description: This key is already associated with an element 
> of this collection
> 
> OK
> 
> ==========
> 
> After clicking OK, the fearuser table is displayed, but only 
> Checks (0) and Columns (30) are displayed. I think there is 
> an error displaying the foreign keys. I have two foreign 
> keys, one with the name "fearusersecuritylevel_fearuser" 
> (which is 32 characters long) and 
> "fearusersecuritylevel_fearusers" (which is 33 characters 
> long). I think there is a bug in either PG or PGAdmin. I 
> understand the name limit in PG is 32 characters, but it 
> seems to have created a 33 character long object name. I 
> think PGAdmin is truncating it to 32 characters, and it can't 
> add two of the same names to the foreign key list.

I just tried this on 7.2.0 and it works fine. Can you supply a full
debug logfile of the error occuring, and perhaps a schema-only pg_dump
of your database?

> This was a mistake when I created the foreign keys. I 
> accidentally misnamed one of the foreign keys. I would like 
> to rename it, but as far as I know I can't rename 
> constraints. Also, I can't drop the constraint because 
> (according to the documentation) "To remove FOREIGN KEY 
> constraints you need to recreate and reload the table". 
> Reloading the table is not possible (or would be extremely 
> hard) because at least 50 views and 20 tables depend on this table.

You should be able to rename them by manually updating the relevant
entries in pg_trigger. Try it on a test system first though - I've never
done it myself and there might be some reason why it doesn't work
correctly.

> Speaking of which ... does PGAdmin do dependency checking? If 
> not, I might be able to lend a hand in writing some code to 
> check dependencies (like the MSSQL Enterprise Manager) ... 
> that might be a useful feature I've always imagined ... I was 
> also looking at the part about adding foreign keys to tables 
> ... is that hard to code or has it just been on nobody's 
> priority list? I might be able to help there too ... (this is 
> off topic -- i should subscribe to the hacker list) ...

Jean-Michel Poure added dependency tracking to pgAdmin I, but I was
never 100% happy with it. PostgreSQL is in a far better position to do
it, and in fact does now in 7.3.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to