Isn't there some internal uniqueness tracking mechanism? Object IDs or something?
On Tue., 10 Sep. 2019, 9:56 pm Dave Page, <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:24 AM Arni Kromić <arni.kro...@bios-ict.hr> > wrote: > >> On 10/09/2019 14.42, richard coleman wrote: >> >> Dave, >> >> While I agree it's generally a good idea to have a primary key, the >> solution as currently implemented leaves the user unable to edit, or in >> this case to even add a record to table without one. I would suggest >> either having pgAdmin4 compute some sort of an *internal key* for cases >> like this, or in the alternative *disable* those features (such as View/ >> *Edit*) that have not been implemented for cases such as this. Perhaps >> with a dialog informing the user that "Editing or adding data isn't >> supported on tables without a primary key". >> >> rik. >> >> I agree this is a corner case as mentioned. However, sometimes PK-s (or >> indexes) are simply not needed, say if the table is insert-only most of the >> time and its data gets dumped without any filters, and nothing ever needs >> to be deleted. I believe Inserts should also work from pgAdmin as they do >> from code. >> >> So, should a issue be raised, or is it already decided this is a >> "wontfix"? >> > > No, it's not decided. Feel free to add a feature request, but it's likely > to be considered low priority. > > >> -- >> Kind Regards, >> Arni Kromić >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 8:34 AM Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 8:24 AM richard coleman < >>> rcoleman.ascen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> My $0.02. Tested the first one here (Kubuntu 18.04, Chromium, pgAdmin >>>> 4 4.12) with mixed results. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 7:59 AM Aditya Toshniwal < >>>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 5:13 PM Arni Kromić <arni.kro...@bios-ict.hr> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Working with pgAdmin, I've found several bugs. Not sure if they are >>>>>> already reported; couldn't find them on Redmine, but perhaps I missed >>>>>> them. >>>>>> Maybe someone will recognize if they've already been reported. Here it >>>>>> goes... >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) When doing View/Edit on an empty table, I cannot insert anything >>>>>> when it opens. There is no empty row I can write into, like there is >>>>>> when a >>>>>> table has at least one row already. In fact, there are no rows at all, >>>>>> just >>>>>> the header. >>>>>> >>>>> I tried. I get an empty row to enter >>>>> [image: Screenshot 2019-09-10 at 17.25.25.png] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Test table0: two columns both character varying columns, no primary >>>> key, View/Edit opens without any rows as the original poster Arni wrote. >>>> >>>> Test table1: three columns, two character varying, one primary key >>>> bigint, View/Edit opens with a single blank row as Aditya reported. >>>> >>>> Does Arni's table have a primary key defined? Is it a bigint? It >>>> looks like there might be a bug where pgAdmin4 isn't presenting a row to >>>> add a record from the View/Edit function if there isn't a primary key, or a >>>> particular type of primary key defined on the table. >>>> >>> >>> If memory serves that was a design choice when the code was implemented. >>> We cannot safely allow editing without a primary key, and adding rows >>> (which arguably is safe) is considered editing as the code is currently >>> implemented. >>> >>> I consider this a corner-case; typically one would have a primary key on >>> a table to identify individual rows, and most cases where you wouldn't are >>> probably not ones where you'd ever try to edit or manually add data >>> (consider something like sensor output data). I'm not sure how much demand >>> there would be for doing this; clearly not a huge amount. >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Page >>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com >>> Twitter: @pgsnake >>> >>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com >>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >