On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 10:28, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:19 AM Shaheed Haque <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still on 4.2, but checking the release notes for 4.3 suggests it too
>> has the problem of being dependent on psycopg2 versus psycopg2-binary. This
>> results in the annoying message:
>>
>> /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/psycopg2/__init__.py:144:
>>> UserWarning: The psycopg2 wheel package will be renamed from release 2.8;
>>> in order to keep installing from binary please use "pip install
>>> psycopg2-binary" instead. For details see: <
>>> http://initd.org/psycopg/docs/install.html#binary-install-from-pypi>.
>>>
>>
>> My package also had this problem, and the fix was to replace the
>> reference to psycopg2 with  psycopg2-binary in setup.py. I hope that helps,
>>
>
> This is not a problem for us - it's completely intentional. We need full
> control over the build of psycopg2, so we can ensure that it, and the
> libpq, OpenSSL, Gettext and other dependent libraries as well as our
> runtime and Python build are all using the same compiler and compiler flags
> etc.
>

That makes sense.


> If there's a way that we could conditionally use psycopg2-binary *just*
> for the wheel, I'd be open to that, but I'm not sure how we could do it.
>

OK, I can see that might be tricky. What, if anything, can I as an end-user
(i.e. someone wanting as little in the way of source builds as possible
:-)) do to avoid the warning? For example, if I were to "pip3 install
--upgrade psycopg2-binary" after the install of pgadmin4, would that be a
reasonable/supported thing to do to get rid of the warning? Or would I end
up with some horrendous/confusing mess?

Thanks, Shaheed

P.S. I should perhaps explain that we have quite a few Bash and Python
scripts that end up indirectly importing the package, and thus our log
files are sprinkled with these messages...





>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to