Hi Dave, Understood. I don’t think anyone expects you do that much work; I think we were just expecting/hoping it would be a recompile with a different switch sort of thing.
Jack > On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > Updating to 64bit would require a huge amount of work to first get the code > working properly with wxWidgets 3, and then to move to Cocoa rather than > Carbon. > > It’s not a good use of time given how unmaintainable (and out of date) that > code has become - it’s definitely not something I have time to do I’m afraid. > Time would be far better spend filling the remaining gaps in pgAdmin 4 > (whatever they are - we’ve addressed the majority that were reported). > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com <http://pgsnake.blogspot.com/> > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com/> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > On 5 Nov 2018, at 17:47, Jack Royal-Gordon <jac...@pobox.com > <mailto:jac...@pobox.com>> wrote: > >> +1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess >> I’ll hold off until they respond to this request. >> >> >>> On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <b...@literacybridge.org >>> <mailto:b...@literacybridge.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run >>> pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for >>> 64bit. >>> >>> Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave? >>> >>> I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability >>> and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin >>> rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature. >>> >>> (And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is >>> still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is >>> pretty, though.) >>