Hi Dave,

Please find updated patch.

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:

> Can you rebase this please?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@
> enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Please find updated patch & updated test case to cover that as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> PFA updated patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Using your example on the ticket, I added a "character varying (32)"
>>> column with NOT NULL to the table. When I then edit the column, and turn
>>> off NOT NULL (making no other changes), the SQL generated is:
>>>
>>> ALTER TABLE public.test_drop
>>>     ALTER COLUMN col2 TYPE character varying (32) COLLATE
>>> pg_catalog."default";
>>> ALTER TABLE public.test_drop
>>>     ALTER COLUMN col2 DROP NOT NULL;
>>>
>>> I didn't see that when turning off NOT NULL for col1.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Attachment: RM_2989_v2_rebase.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to