Sure. I will send a patch. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Thanks. Whoever picks up this task will need to include that info in the > libraries.txt file so we know exactly what 3rd party stuff is in the tree. > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Shirley Wang <sw...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> They're from the Google fonts directory : https://fonts.google.com/sel >> ection?category=Monospace&selection.family=Open+Sans:400, >> 400i,600,700|Source+Code+Pro:400,700 >> <https://fonts.google.com/selection?category=Monospace&selection.family=Open+Sans:400,400i,600,700%7CSource+Code+Pro:400,700> >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:28 PM Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Shirley Wang <sw...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Following up on Anthony's comment in another thread, here are the open >>>> source fonts that I used in the test builds. >>>> >>>> I don't have the CSS skills to create a patch for submission, could >>>> someone take the lead and help create these? >>>> >>>> Attached is a font file that includes Open Sans (regular, italic, >>>> semibold, and bold) and Source Code Pro (regular and bold). Open Sans is >>>> used for body text in place of Helvetica/Arial and Source Code Pro is a >>>> monospace to be used in place of Monospace. >>>> >>> >>> What is the canonical source of these fonts? >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Page >>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com >>> Twitter: @pgsnake >>> >>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com >>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >>> >> > > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
