On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm suggesting that it be pushed
>
Akshay is already on to it, and currently reviewing it.
Will push it once get the confirmation.
-- Thanks, Ashesh
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> On 24 August 2017 at 23:00, Teng Zhang <tezh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Sure, you can get as much as you like.
>> Thanks
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [pgadmin4][Patch] Greenplum specific DDL and Dashboard
>> display
>> To: Teng Zhang <tezh...@pivotal.io>
>> Cc: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com>, pgadmin-hackers <
>> pgadmin-hack...@postgresql.org>, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>, Jing Li <
>> jin...@pivotal.io>
>>
>>
>> Can we get some movement on this patch? This seems like a more sane way
>> to go to support different "products"
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> On 22 August 2017 at 16:56, Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 22 August 2017 at 16:41, Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok,
>>>>
>>>> Surely this :
>>>>
>>>> self.table_template_path = 'table/sql/' + (
>>>> + '#{0}#{1}#'.format(server_type, ver)
>>>> + if server_type == 'gpdb' else
>>>> + '#{0}#'.format(ver)
>>>> + )
>>>>
>>>> could be written in a more readable manner ??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Apologies, after reading a bit, this is apparently idiomatic python.
>>>
>>> Please ignore
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>
>>>> On 22 August 2017 at 14:25, Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been able to get back to this and test it. So far so good. It
>>>>> applies more or less cleanly against 1.6 and everything I've tried so far
>>>>> works
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll update more as I test it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 August 2017 at 05:29, Teng Zhang <tezh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the review, here is a fixed patch working for GBDP which
>>>>>> shows the appropriate graphs.
>>>>>> In this fix, we toke out the changes to diver/psycopg2 and
>>>>>> implemented the greenplum version checking process in the ppas way
>>>>>> mentioned by Dave Cramer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Teng Zhang & Hao Wang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>> ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ashesh, do you have a recommended way to do this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't looked at the patch, but I assume it adds a database
>>>>>>>> driver module for GPDB?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have not looked at the patch yet.
>>>>>>> I will take a look at it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jing Li <jin...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since we're hoping to get this change working for GPDB we've
>>>>>>>>> currently using this method to detect if it's gpdb and show the
>>>>>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>>>>> graphs. Right now it displays errors on the dashboard if it's
>>>>>>>>> connected to
>>>>>>>>> a gpdb server.
>>>>>>>>> For this patch specifically, the goal is to improve the experience
>>>>>>>>> for greenplum users so they can get the same information as someone
>>>>>>>>> connected to a postgres server.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do agree that this is a bigger discussion about how we handle
>>>>>>>>> behavior change overall if it's regular postgres or something else.
>>>>>>>>> Let's
>>>>>>>>> talk about how we can restructure this behavior in a wider context.
>>>>>>>>> Are you
>>>>>>>>> open to meeting about it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> ~Jing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 5:37 AM, Dave Cramer davecra...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Violet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't really like the way this has been implemented. It adds a
>>>>>>>>>> variable which is only used for gpdb.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are other places in the code where the behaviour is changed
>>>>>>>>>> if the server is ppas or regular postgres.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Candidly I think all of this needs restructuring.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 15 August 2017 at 23:29, Violet Cheng <vch...@pivotal.io>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any comment on this patch? If no, will it be committed soon?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Violet
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Sarah McAlear <
>>>>>>>>>> smcal...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hackers!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This patch enables Greenplum users to see the same charts on the
>>>>>>>>>> dashboard as postgres users. It also adds some additional
>>>>>>>>>> information to
>>>>>>>>>> the DDL that is Greenplum specific and necessary to create a new
>>>>>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>> Sarah
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
