On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> compressed logs to petsc-users/petsc-dev is acceptable now.
>
> [not sure if autocompression of attachments can be setup with mailmain
> mailing lists]
>
> macports has some conflicts with the default blas/lapack - so its best
> to avoid it. [you can use --download-openmpi to get non-macports mpi]
Satish,
We should fix the PETSc BLAS/LAPACK configuration (BuildSystem) to not "have
conflicts with macports blas/lapack" by, for example, to use the Apple
BLAS/LAPACK if the macports one fail. That is, we shouldn't tell people not to
use macports, we should have a configuration system robust enough to handle
macports problems. Is this a problem we can reproduce? and hence debug? and
hence fix?
Barry
>
> [or use macports to install petsc aswell. I believe if you use
> scienceports to install PETSc - it might do the right thing with
> blas/lapack]
>
> Satish
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> George,
>>
>> Send configure.log to petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2013, at 9:28 PM, George Pau <gpau at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am having some trouble configuring petsc on my mac. I have an updated
>>> macport distribution of openmpi. But, the configure fails with the
>>> following error:
>>>
>>> Incomplete LAPACK install? Perhaps lapack package is installed - but
>>> lapack-dev/lapack-devel is required.
>>>
>>> I can't find a lapack-dev on macport as well. It occurs even though with
>>> --with-debugging=0.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> George Pau
>>> Earth Sciences Division
>>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>>> One Cyclotron, MS 74-120
>>> Berkeley, CA 94720
>>>
>>> (510) 486-7196
>>> gpau at lbl.gov
>>> http://esd.lbl.gov/about/staff/georgepau/
>>
>>
>
