Hm we reverted all fortran examples to use CHKERRQ(). [from PetscCall] so presumably CHKERRQ() is still the preferred interface from fortran?
Satish On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote: > Hi Glenn, > > `PetscCall()` is the future, apologies for the confusion. > > `CHKERRQ()` was mistakenly deleted from the fortran include files but exists > for backwards-compatibility only. > > Unlike “normal” changes we opted not to formally deprecate `CHKERRQ()` and > friends (complete with compiler warnings) since they are so widely used. > > Best regards, > > Jacob Faibussowitsch > (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch) > > > On Apr 26, 2022, at 17:36, Hammond, Glenn E via petsc-dev > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > PETSc, > > > > I see that CHKERRQ is back in the Fortran interface after 3.17.1. Will > > CHKERRQ be removed in the future? I just wrote a script to refactor > > PFLOTRAN [CHKERRQ() -> PetscCall()], and I want to know which direction to > > head before asking everything to check in all their dev branches. If > > CHKERRQ() is available with Fortran for the future, I will abandon the > > script and leave the devs alone. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Glenn >
