I agree with your comments, I have been using linux since the mid 1990s, thought test was quite good because-
- you have to have been using a linux a long long long while to get all the answers all have the background knowledge - their are real techncial questions in it - I dont think anyone is going to get a 100%!!! - Anyone getting 100% I thinkl qulifies as a "real" geek. - I did not get 100% PLUG are beating SLUG so far!!!! Paul >...----- Original message ----- >From: Mark Rogers <m...@quarella.co.uk> >To: peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk >Subject: Re: [Peterboro] Linux IQ admin test >Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:00:32 +0100 > >n 31/03/12 18:04, Paul Scally wrote: > http://www.infoworld.com/t/linux/linux-admin-iq-test-066?source=rs > >Sadly[*] only 75%, although it would have been 85% if I'd read two of the >questions correctly... Mental note, don't do IQ tests while you wait for the >coffee to brew, do them after you've drunk it! > >Some of the wrong answers were quite amusing though :-) > >[*] It's mostly a "general knowledge"-type test and it would be fair for most >newcomers to do quite badly even if they're competent sysadmins. But I have >been using Linux for a *long* time and should have done better! -- Paul Scally p1sc1...@fastmail.fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different... _______________________________________________ Peterboro mailing list Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
