Hmmmmm ...... Lisp anybody ? Martin
On 30 March 2010 16:43, Mark Rogers <m...@quarella.co.uk> wrote: > On 26/03/10 22:52, Steve Tompkins-MacQueen wrote: > > Can the OO camp answer the question proving what thay say that OO is good > for big complex problems. Or perhaps OO is NO!!! good. > > > > To be honest, I think there may be better languages for this type of > thing. Way back when I was playing with artificial intelligence, Prolog > was what we were using, and from what I can remember it or something > derived from it would be a good choice for your application. It's not OO > (maybe there's an OO derivative now?) > > -- > Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450 > Registered in England (0456 0902) @ 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG > > > _______________________________________________ > Peterboro mailing list > Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro >
_______________________________________________ Peterboro mailing list Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
