Is this particular change one that could be implemented algorithmically, or at least partially so? (E.g. For all modules check for the presence of a ":D". If it's there, no action. If not, insert a line of code. Run a test. If successful, post change. If not, alert a human)
- Re: To :D or not to :D Patrick R. Michaud
- Re: To :D or not to :D Mark Overmeer
- Re: To :D or not to :D Tobias Leich
- Re: To :D or not to :D Moritz Lenz
- Re: To :D or not to :D Mark Overmeer
- Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Richard Hainsworth
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Darren Duncan
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1.0 Moritz Lenz
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Mark Overmeer
- Exploit the versioning (was Re: Backwards... Darren Duncan
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Parrot Raiser
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Darren Duncan
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... yary
- Re: Exploit the versioning (was Re: B... Darren Duncan
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Smylers
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Tobias Leich
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Elizabeth Mattijsen
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Mark Overmeer
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Elizabeth Mattijsen
- Re: Backwards compatibility and relea... Moritz Lenz
- Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1... Richard Hainsworth