Mark Overmeer wrote:
A pity you didn't want to read the paper.
I have better things to do with my life than read your 30-page paper. I'd rather participate in a consensus process where I feel I can make a difference.
Please clarify ... how would you specify that? And how would you denote ranges of conflicting packages? Well, maybe start with putting that in your wishlist. And conflicting/dependencies in licenses? How would you resolve dependency conflicts? Design human intervention in this process of dependency processing. [big snip]
My wiki page was purposely only an initial step. I don't believe in working in isolation for days or weeks and then handing down a massive ready-made solution to the masses. I offer a small, incremental step on top of Synopsis 22 and hope that it is useful.
Daniel.
