Sex, 2008-11-14 às 09:14 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu: > That's correct. We could fix it two ways. Either the mainline code > gets a consistent new name, or the outermost scope is redefined to an INIT > if there is a user-defined MAIN. I can argue it both ways.
I'd argue that there's an implicit INIT block around all the mainline code. daniel
