Perhaps I'm missing something; but why couldn't you say '[lt]:lc $a, $b, $c'?

That is, I see the "reducing meta-operator" as a way of taking a
list-associative infix operator and treating it as a function call,
albeit one with a funny name.  As such, you should be able to do
things with a reduced operator in the same way that you could with any
function that has a signature of ([EMAIL PROTECTED], *%adverb).  Am I wrong?

-- 
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang

Reply via email to