On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:40:53AM -0400, Trey Harris wrote: > In a message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Moritz Lenz writes: > >I assume that 'Num' is meant to be a non-complex. > >Then it seems to make sense to assume: > >Int is Rat > >Rat is Num > >Num is Complex > >or am I off again? > > S29 seems to have been assuming this, if I'm reading the multis correctly.
Keep in mind that some of S29's assumptions regarding types may no longer be true, especially since we've decided that many of the builtin methods and functions will now go in "Any" (e.g., C<join>). Pm
