On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:06:25AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote: : Larry~ : : On 10/26/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > So we'd get: : > : > :@array[42] 42 => @array[1] : : Do you mean C< :@array[42] 42 => @array[42] >?
Yes. I was changing it because 42 : 1 :: foo : a, but I flubbed. : > The last three forms are more arguable than the first three, especially : > since they probably aren't valid formal parameters. We kind of need : > a subscript modifier instead: : > : > @array:[42] 42 => @array[1] : : Same question. Same answer. Larry
