Yesterday I spend some hours getting pugs to understand translitterations with multiple ranges in each pair. E.g.
"foobar".trans( "a-z" => "n-za-n" ); By accident I tested something like: "foobar".trans( ['a' .. 'z'] => "n-za-m" ); and it didn't work. The problem is that ['a' .. 'z'] gets stringified to 'a b c d ...' which gets 'b' translated to the third letter in the right hand side. Is this supposed to work and if so how should the code differ between "foobar".trans( ['a' .. 'b'] => '12'); # a=>1, b=>2 "foobar".trans( "a b" => "123" ) # a=>1, ' '=>2, b=>3 Same problem ocurs if left hand side is a string and right hand side is an array reference but in this case the code implementing trans can see it. -- Peter Makholm | Why does the entertainment industry wants us to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | believe that a society base on full surveillance http://hacking.dk | is bad? | Do they have something to hide?
