On 10/6/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > for @foo Y @bar Y @baz -> $quux, $xyzzy { ... } > > is something you will probably not see very often, it's still legal > Perl, even though it looks asymmetric. This too makes finding the > solution in arguments a non-solution.
Don't be silly. There's no reason we can't break that; it's not an idiom anybody is counting on. If you still want the behavior: for flatten(@foo Y @bar Y @baz) -> $quux, $xyzzy {...} But your point about Y returning a list and therefore not being for-specific is quite valid. Luke