Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-06-15 19:14 (+0200):
> as Larry mentioned in another thread that he wants a "different
> notation for word splitting"
> (http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/21874),
> how about that, similar to Haskell's "words" function:

"words" is wrong for something that splits. It'd be right for something
that matches. Let me demonstrate:

    "(foo bar --baz blah-- quux)".words;

This should return <foo bar baz blah quux>, not <(foo bar --baz blah--
quux)>. So the name "words" isn't good for this.

>     say join ",", @words;     # "hi,my,name,is,ingo";

Following the logic that .words returns the words, the words are no
longer individual words when joined on comma instead of whitespace...


Juerd
-- 
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html 
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html

Reply via email to