Mark~ On 5/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mark A. Biggar wrote: > > > Well the identity of % is +inf (also right side only). > > > > I read $n % any( $n..Inf ) == $n. The point is there's no > > unique right identity and thus (Num,%) disqualifies for a > > Monoid. BTW, the above is a nice example where a junction > > needn't be preserved :) > > If as usual the definition of a right identity value e is that a op e = a for > all a, > then only +inf works. Besdies you example should have been; > $n % any (($n+1)..Inf), $n % $n = 0. > > > > E.g. if X<Y is left associative and returns Y when true then ... > > > > Sorry, is it the case that $x = $y < $z might put something else > > but 0 or 1 into $x depending on the order relation between $y and $z? > > Which is one reason why I siad that it might not make sense to define the > chaining ops in terms of the associtivity of the binary ops, But as we are > interested in what [<] over the empty list shoud return , the identity (left > or right) of '<' is unimportant as I think that should return false as there > is nothing to be less then anything else. Note that defaulting to undef > therefore works in that case.
On the contrary a mathematician would say that the empty list is monotonically increasing (vacuously) and the answer should be true. Matt -- "Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory." -???
