On 5/11/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a somewhat related topic: > > pugs> (1,(2,3),4)[2] > 4 > > Because the invocant to .[] assumes a Singular context.
Right, but the *inside* of the invocant is still a list, so it's in list context. I think that line should return 3. Luke
